I am ashamed to be Sierra Leonean.

OK, that’s not entirely true. But I am ashamed of my government.

You see, the Sierra Leonean parliament recently passsed a child rights bill that outlaws the marriage of under-aged girls. But they also removed a provision in the bill that would have made Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) illegal.

FGM, euphemistically known as female circumcision, may involve as much as the total or partial removal of the clitoris and other external parts of the female genitalia. Throughout much of Africa, girls undergo the procedure upon entering puberty. The resultant decrease in sexual sesitivity is not the worst consequence of this violent and barbaric practice. Women who undergo this practice may also get infections in the cut area and develop scar tissue, which isn’t as stretchy as normal skin and may tear during intercourse and childbirth, leading to further risk of infection and other reproductive complications. Another health hazard is the spread of HIV through the use of unsterilized cutting instruments.

While parliament deserves some credit for raising the age of marriagability, it is disappointing that they chose not to outlaw FGM. The opposite course of action would have struck a blow for women in Africa and given me a reason to be proud of my government, especially at this time when there is less and less for Sierra Leoneans to be proud of.

Sierra Leoneans have a rich and old culture with many, many positive aspects. FGM is not one of them. We do not need to mutilate our women to preserve our culture. We can afford to let go of this monstrous practice.

Read more on this story here.


One thought on “I am ashamed to be Sierra Leonean.

  1. Hey,
    I saw that. Actually as a Sierra Leonean the whole FMG thing hurts my feelings.

    However, what would be realy a step forward is if parliment would get rid of the clause in our constitution that allows Traditional Leaders to overrule the constitution in their decision-making. Bascially a chief is not obliged to defer to our constitution and his rulings are binding.

    Right after independence I can see how this clause was a necessary deal maker. Now that we (I hope) have accepted to being one nation, should traditional leaders be allowed to act so freely?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s